Posts Tagged ‘2.5ghz’

Penryn MacBook Pro 3D Mark 06 Benchmarks

Saturday, March 1st, 2008

Ok people.  Everyone has been asking for benchmarks on the new MacBook Pro with the Intel Penyrn processor.  So, courtesy of the Bit Boy, here it is.  This is a standard hardware configuration of the 15″ model.  Highlights include 2.5Ghz Core2, 2GB ram, 512MB GeForce 8600GT and a 250GB 5400RPM HD.  If you are looking for some other specs, dont be a bitch and read below.  On a side note, I am quite impressed with this latest MacBook as it considerably out performs my 1st gen MacBook Pro.

Score

 4116 3DMarks

 

 

Name

Untitled

   

 

Description

 

 

 

Date

Mar 01, 2008 18:54 CST

 

 

Case

Not specified

 

 

Power supply

Not specified

 

 

Operating System

Microsoft Windows XP

 

 

 

 

 

System type

32-bit

 

 

Motherboard manufacturer

Apple Inc.

 

 

Motherboard model

Mac-F42C89C8

 

 

Hard drive model

Hitachi HTS542525K9SA00

 

 

Memory

2048 MB

 

 

Processor

Intel Core 2

 

 

Processor

 

 

Processor clock

2494 MHz

 

 

Physical and logical processors

1 / 2

 

 

Multicore

2 Processor Cores

 

 

FSB

200 MHz

 

 

Display information

 

 

 

Graphics card vendor

Nvidia Corp

 

 

Graphics memory

512 MB

 

 

Core clock

0.0 MHz

 

 

Memory clock

0.0 MHz

 

 

Driver name

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT

 

 

Driver version

6.14.11.6763

 

 

Driver status

WHQL - Not FM Approved

 

 

Linked display adapters

No

 

 

Graphics Card

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT

 

 

 

 

Benchmark settings

Program Version

3DMark06 Revision 1 Build 0

 

Resolution

1280×1024

 

Full Screen Anti-Aliasing

None

 

Texture Filtering

Optimal

 

Vertex Shader Profile

3_0

 

Pixel Shader Profile

3_0

 

Force Full Precision

No

 

Disable Post-processing

No

 

Force Software Vertex Shaders

No

 

Force Software FP Filtering

No

 

Disable Harware Shadow Mapping

No

 

Colour Mipmaps

No

 

Repeat Count

Off

 

Fixed Framerate

Off

 

Main test results

3DMark Score

4116 3DMarks

 

SM 2.0 Score

1622

 

SM 3.0 Score

1514

 

CPU Score

2296

 

Test Results

Graphics Tests

    1 - Return to Proxycon

12.71 FPS

 

    2 - Firefly Forest

14.33 FPS

 

CPU Tests

    CPU1 - Red Valley

0.72 FPS

 

    CPU2 - Red Valley

1.16 FPS

 

HDR Tests

    1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0)

13.42 FPS

 

    2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0)

16.85 FPS

 

Feature Tests

    Fill Rate - Single Texturing

N/A

 

    Fill Rate - Multi Texturing

N/A

 

    Pixel Shader

N/A

 

    Vertex Shader - Simple

N/A

 

    Vertex Shader - Complex

N/A

 

    Shader Particles (SM 3.0)

N/A

 

    Perlin Noise (SM 3.0)

N/A

 

Batch Tests

    8 Triangles

N/A

 

    32 Triangles

N/A

 

    128 Triangles

N/A

 

    512 Triangles

N/A

 

    2048 Triangles

N/A

 

    32768 Triangles

N/A

 

 


 

New or Old 2.5 & 2.6 Ghz AMD Barcelona Chips?

Saturday, February 16th, 2008

As you read this, the latest version of AMD Barcelona chips should be arriving at the Fry’s Electronics near you.  After reading an article about the delivery of these chips, I began to ponder whether they are really new chips at all.  Now, just so you don’t misinterpret me, I mean physically new.  As in, were they manufactured recently, or have they been sitting in a warehouse in inventory for some time.

Right about now, you are probably thinking the Bit Boy has gone nuts.  But seriously, think about these facts.

1.)  The new chips are the same stepping as the old ones.  The design has not physically changed.  This means they still contain the bug that has reportedly been reducing speeds.  See AMD’s website for the errata.

2.)  These chips are still 65nm process.

3.)  Phenom CPUs are notoriously bad for over-clocking.  Probably because they are already cooked from the factory.

In the semiconductor business, its common for a variety of processors of varying speeds to actually be the same exact chip.  In many cases manufacturers clock them down to service varying markets.  This is why overclocking has been popular among hardware hackers for years.  Usually the chips are tested after they are manufactured and the ones with better tolerances test better and are clocked higher.

Now why would AMD  wait before releasing these chips?  I mean, they are behind Intel right?  True.  I would guess that only a small number of these CPUs were testing out capable of the higher clock speeds.  So my assumption is that AMD released the lower clock chips while stockpiling the faster ones.  If the faster chips only accounted for 5% to 10% of production.  Then you would have to stockpile for a few months before you had adequate quantity to go to market.  Sure, you would eventually run out of inventory, but hopefully, you would fill demand while transferring to the 45nm process necessary to push forward to higher clock speeds.  This strategy might help you catch up with Intel a bit.

Now, if there are any AMD engineers out there, I would love to hear from you!